Tag Archives: PondyCAN

Sunita Narain: Where are the beaches?

The Business Standard has published an article by Sunita Narain called:  “Where are the beaches?”  based on Ms. Narain’s visit to the eroded beaches along the coast of Pondicherry.  The text of the article, dated 9 May 2011, appears below:

We were on a beach, somewhere close to Puducherry. It was a surreal sight: half-smashed houses with fronts wide open, and people still living in them. The devastation was caused not by a sea storm or cyclone, but by the eroded beach. The sea had crept up to the village so there was no protection between the sea and the village.

Why was this happening, I asked. My guides were members of the Pondy Citizens’ Action Network (PondyCAN), which has worked tirelessly to draw the nation’s attention to beach erosion.

To understand this, we walked a little distance away from the devastated village. From the beach, I could see massive granite stones piled up to build a groyne stretching into the sea. This structure, constructed to protect villages from erosion, ends up protecting one village and destroying another, explained my guides.

But I could still not see the connection. How could one small structure like this change the coastal ecology? Civil engineer Probir Banerjee and marine engineer Aurofilio Schiavina explained that a beach is not just a lot of sand. “Beaches are rivers of sand” because each year sea waves transport huge quantities of sand from north to south and south to north. During the southwest monsoon, some 600,000 cubic metres of sand is moved towards the north. Also, during the three months of the northeast monsoon (when winds are fierce), as much as 100,000 cubic metres of sand gets transported towards the south across the eastern coasts of the country.

So beaches are living creatures – winds and waves bring sand in one season and take it away in another. My teachers further explained marine science: “Then, think of the groyne as a dam in a river which will block the movement of sand, not water.” In this case, the groyne has stopped the movement of sand to the beach ahead. Thus, the beach does not grow and when the wind changes, the monsoon gets fierce, and the sea moves in. There is no beach to protect the land beyond.

The lesson did not finish yet. Our next stop was the Puducherry harbour, with a breakwater making its way into the sea to protect boats. This structure, which was built in 1986, marked the beginning of devastating changes at the coast. Once the harbour was built, it first changed the beach closest to it – the beach along the city of Puducherry.

“I played on the beach as a child,” said V Narayanasamy, member of Parliament from Puducherry and minister of state in the Prime Minister’s Office. “What beach?” I asked. All I could see for miles were black granite stones piled along the ocean promenade. By then it was evening. People had gathered to enjoy the beach and the sunset. But there was neither sand nor beach – only rocks.

All this had been lost in living memory in 15 to 20 years. People had lost their playground. More importantly, a city had lost its critical ecosystem, which would protect its land and recharge its groundwater. And fishermen had lost their livelihood.

But this is just the beginning, explained Mr Banerjee. This structure, small by modern standards of harbours or ports, has spun an entire chain of changes in the beach along the coast. The groyne that we saw earlier was built because the length of the coast stretching 10 to 20 km was now destablised. We could see piles of sand accumulated before the harbour, blocking way to regenerate the beaches. Now every beach needs a groyne and every groyne adds to the problem of the next beach.

Ports are interventions in the natural ecology of coasts. But we neither understand the impact nor worry about dealing with the damage. A few years ago, Puducherry woke up to the reality that its harbour required to be rebuilt and contracts and concessions were awarded to transform it into a massive port (some 20 million tonnes annually). The citizens’ group, which was against the project, went to the court. But the developer – who, strangely, had no experience in ports, and built shops and malls – is not letting go. This is a sweet deal, which brings real estate benefits since the port concession package comes with cheap city land for cost recovery.

In this stretch of some 600 km, you can count seven ports that exist and another three are proposed. This is when each existing port is not used to capacity and is still being upgraded big time. Then why are we building more ports? Is this development? Or land grab?

Interestingly, there is an absence of policy on siting and the number of ports in the country. The Central government knows only about “major” ports and leaves the rest – permission to locate and build other ports – to state governments. There is no distinction between a major port and a state port. It is just a matter of how many one can fit into the coast as fast, and as profitably, as possible. Nobody, therefore, knows how many ports are being built. Nobody cares about the cumulative impact on rivers of sand.

Surely, this cannot be called development. Can it?

sunita@cseindia.org

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Saving India’s Beaches: Jairam Ramesh’s Responses – NDTV Reports

June 22, 2009

In the report above, Jairam Ramesh, the Minister of Environment and Forest, declares his priority to ensure that the CMZ 2009 does not adversely affect the livelihood of fisher families as well as doing an inventory of port development.

July 7, 2009

In the video above, Vivekanandan, member of the South Indian Federation of Fishermen Societies (SIFFS), reports on his meeting with Jairam Ramesh.  In his meeting, the Minister has agreed that the CMZ, in it’s current form, will be allowed to lapse and a new process of dialogue with the fishing community will start, including 5 consultations across the coast (Chennai, Bhuvaneshwar, Cochin, Goa and Bombay) to provide feedback to help the ministry to re-work or improve the CRZ.

July 7, 2009

In the report above, NDTV interviews Jairam Ramesh and Probir Banerjee, President of PondyCAN.  Probir Banerjee speaks of the water and food security issues as a result of port and SEZ (Special Economic Zone) development.  Jairam Ramesh has commissioned a study of the overall, cumulative impacts of the port developments.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Celebrate World Oceans Day – 8 June 2009

World Oceans Day

The concept for World Oceans Day was proposed in 1992 by the Government of Canada at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro and it had been unofficially celebrated every year since then. Official designation by the U.N. is a significant step in conserving and protecting our world’s ocean.

World Oceans Day provides an opportunity each year to celebrate our world oceans and our personal connection to the sea.

As of 2009, “World Oceans Day” has been officially declared by the United Nations as June 8th each year!

The world’s oceans:

  • Generates most of the oxygen we breathe
  • Helps feed us
  • Regulates our climate
  • Cleans the water we drink
  • Offers us a pharmacopoeia of potential medicines
  • Provides limitless inspiration!

One of PondyCAN’s initial initiative has been to bring back the beach along the Pondicherry coast, on the shores of the Bay of Bengal. This initiative is now expanding its scope to safeguarding the coast of the whole country. It is therefore only natural that we are engaged in the celebrations of the World Oceans Day.

We hope you will join us in the pledges we will take on this day.

Best regards
from the PondyCAN team

PRESS RELEASE

June 8, 2009

PondyCAN is proud to join leading educational institutions, conservation organizations, and  individuals in dozens of countries around the world to celebrate our shared oceans.  World Oceans Day – held on June 8 of each year – is an opportunity to celebrate our world oceans and our personal connection to the sea.

The Ocean Project, an international network of over 830 aquariums, zoos, museums, and conservation organizations is working closely with the World Ocean Network to coordinate activities worldwide under the theme “helping our climate – helping our ocean” with a special focus on coral reefs.

The world’s oceans cover more than 70% of our planet’s surface and the rich web of life they support is the result of hundreds of millions of years of evolution. Nomadic peoples were collecting shellfish and harvesting fish long before the dawn of settled agriculture. Great human civilizations, from the Egyptians to the Polynesians relied on the sea for commerce and transport. In our immediate region, the great Cholas were able to spread their empire across much of the Far East by their close relationship with the sea. Now, at the end of the Twentieth Century, our fate is as tied to the oceans as ever. We still rely on fish for a significant portion of our daily protein needs, and more than $500 billion of the world’s economy is tied to ocean-based industries such as coastal tourism and shipping. Perhaps most important, this vast mass of water acts to help regulate the global climate and to ensure that a constant flow of vital nutrients is cycled throughout the biosphere.

But all is not well in the sea. Increased pressures from overfishing, habitat destruction, pollution and the introduction of invasive alien species have combined in recent decades to threaten the diversity of life in estuaries, coastal waters and oceans. Now a new threat, global warming, is making itself felt, and its impacts could be devastating for life in the sea. In addition to this, in our country, man-made beach erosion due to thoughtless planning and improper implementation is causing the sea, our friend, to become our enemy, lashing hard at our villages and towns and cities, turning our water saline and leaving us vulnerable to its waves and storms. And we blame the sea, our friend, instead of opening our eyes and seeing that it is we, through our careless actions, that are responsible.

Let us take a pledge:

  • Never to distress the sea by taking away its beaches and in turn making ourselves vulnerable to the effects of beach-erosion
  • That any development on the coast is done only after scientific studies determine it is alright
  • That we cannot allow poisoning our own food by indiscriminately putting un-treated sewage and harmful chemical effluents into the sea
  • That we understand that anything we do to harm the sea and oceans in turn harms us and
  • Anything we do to protect and sea and oceans keeps us healthy and safe.

65 years and 2 days ago, the bravery and selflessness of a few was able to change the course of a century. More than a 1000 crafts came in from the sea, bringing 160,000 allied troops to land on the beaches of Normandy. That decisive moment and act of immense bravery led to the victory of the allied forces over the Nazis. It is remembered and revered and commemorated every year because it was a victory won against all odds.

If everyone on the planet took a pledge to live in harmony and peace not only with each other but with everything else on this beautiful blue planet of ours and beyond, we can rest assured of the victory  –  the survival of our species.

So from PondyCAN to all of Pondicherry, India and the rest of world:

Think about this and do what you can.

And as Ocean Project urges: Wear Blue and Tell Two

PondyCAN
35 Francois Martin Street
Kuruchikuppam
Pondicherry 605 012
pondycan@gmail.com
www.pondycan.org

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

“The Fight to Save India’s Beaches” – rediff.com

June 5, 2009

A. Ganesh Nadar of rediff.com interviews PondyCAN president Probir Banerjee on World Environment Day on “The Fight to Save India’s Beaches.” The text of the interview is posted below:

Don’t we all love spending a day out on the beach? Our beaches are not only spots of fun and beauty but they preserve our eco system, protect us from disasters and are a way of life. But if we don’t preserve and look after them all we will be left with is black rocks instead of glistening sand.

On World Environment Day, Probir Banerjee, President of Pondycan, a Pondicherry citizens’ action network highlights a road map to fight the loss of beaches.

Banerjee, an engineer recently gave up his various business interests, to devote himself to saving the beaches he once played on during his childhood.

The crusader explains the crisis to A Ganesh Nadar, and suggests solutions which are practical and simple. But will the government listen?

Could you explain the movement of sand from south to north? Does it happen only on the east coast or also on the west coast?

The sand movement depends on the monsoon. It is one of the highest in the world in India and especially on the east coast.

For nine months in the year, the monsoon travels from south to the north. This moves the sand along the coast towards the north. As the sand moves north the balance is kept by nature by bringing sand along with the rivers. If you see the map of India you will see that the eastern terrain is much larger than the west.

The sand outflow on the western side is much lower than the sand outflow on the eastern side. It comes out from the river’s mouth and moves north along the beach. The beach is actually a river of sand.

Any obstruction that you create acts like a dam and blocks this movement of sand. So the sand in the north will keep moving. And thus there will be a vacuum north of the obstruction.

It’s also happening on the west coast. In Goa, the Taj had a cafe on the beach. Suddenly they saw that the sand was disappearing and one day the cafe collapsed. People thought that it was a natural phenomenon.

It has happened in a village in Tamil Nadu, north of here. They built a groyne into the sea (a groyne is a wall created by dumping huge rocks into the sea). Within three months, 60 metres of the beach disappeared.

In Goa some structures were built south of this beach where the Taj was. They realised that that was the cause only after we explained it. People just say tsunami, global warming or natural disaster without realising the cause.

The beach is dynamic, it is never static. If you stand in the sand in the sea, you can see the movement around your feet. Imagine what happens when you put a permanent obstruction.

The beach has so many functions. It protects us from cyclones and tsunamis. It stops the salinity of the sea water from getting into the ground water inland. It promotes tourism. Festivals are held on it like Ganesh Chaturthi.

The moment erosion happens, the entire ecosystem is lost.

Also people think of development only. They don’t look at the economics of the environment. They look at the profits of development. They should also look at the cost of restoring the environment.

What will be the cost of restoring these beaches? What will be the cost of the real estate lost? What will be the loss of agriculture? What will be the cost of restoring ground water to its pre saline days? What will be the loss in tourism? We should look at all this.

Lack of knowledge is why people are doing whatever they want.

In Pondicherry a wall was built into the sea to protect the harbour. Is that the cause of this problem according to you?

Absolutely! The harbour was built from 1986 to 1989. Twenty crores (Rs 200 million) was given for this harbour. We started seeing the erosion in the early 1990s. It has now traveled 12 kms along the beach. You now see a stone wall all along this beach.

It has affected fishing. If you see photographs on Google earth or any satellite picture you will see there is a huge accumulation of sand south of the harbour. But north of the harbour there is no sand. The dividing line is that harbour. That makes it very evident.

The government is aware of this. They dug a submarine tunnel and put up pumping machines to pump the sand from south to north. Why did that not work?

The designers of the harbour were aware of this problem. So they decided to mechanically do what nature does by herself. They put up dredgers to pump it mechanically. They bought two dredgers.

But they did not do this regularly. This was and is a commercial harbour. As there was no revenue, how do you expect them to spend money on dredging?

Actually, the sand has accumulated along the wall and spilt over into the mouth of the harbour. They keep dredging this mouth so that ships can keep moving in and out.

Suppose the central government underwrites the whole thing. They pay for dredging 24 hours a day for all 365 days. Will that solve the problem?

Yes! If they can keep that up perpetually it will solve the problem. It should be for a lifetime. They should have alternatives if the dredgers break down or if there is any other excuse for stopping the work. They can replace nature’s work if they do it continuously and forever.

What actually happened in Pondicherry was that they knew what was happening so they put up stone walls all along the coast. This added to the problem by blocking further movement of sand.

But they continue doing it because for the PWD (public works department) it’s a big project. The lorry owners are happy. The quarry owners are happy. The panchayat presidents are happy. It’s a money-making racket.

It’s a perpetual project. Today you throw in stones. By next year it will sink. You continue throwing in rocks. It’s a win-win situation for some of the people and a lose-lose situation for a majority of the people.

You have told me what the problem is. What do you think is the solution?

The harbour supports 150 fishing families. To protect these families, 12 fishing villages have been destroyed along the coast. There is a ten feet high wall to protect these 12 villages. Thus their boats cannot go out.

So the government gives them free rice and subsidy for other things. Is this justification? Earlier these Pondicherry fishermen were using Cuddalore port. By holding onto this port the water has become saline in this entire coastal belt.

Nature has a sand bar along the shore to break the waves. Here erosion has removed the sand bar. Now huge waves hit the rocky shoreline and when the water recedes it does so with the same speed. It pulls out the sand from under and in between the rocks further weakening the shore line.

So the shore is sinking as the sand under it is being eroded.

I think closing the harbour is the best solution. Your solution of dredging 24 hours will cost 3 crores (Rs 30 million) a year. Give it to those 150 fishing families. They will find alternative employment.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The Death of India’s Beaches – NDTV Report

On 28 May 2009, NDTV aired a report on “The Death of India’s Beaches”, featuring an interview with PondyCAN’s president, Probir Banerjee.

To view the video on the NDTV site, click here. The text of the report is given below.

NDTV plans a weekly broadcast with reports from each state to examine the effect of ports and rock walls on the coastline and economy of the states.  The next report will be on Orissa.

If you appreciate this kind of reporting, please contact NDTV and let them know.  Also, please let them know of situations and contact information for people working on coastal issues in other states.

The death of India’s beaches

NDTV Correspondent, Thursday May 28, 2009, Chennai

Over the span of a few decades, India has lost almost half its beaches along its once beautiful coastline.  And in a few years from now, India won’t have a single beach left.  We are losing our beaches every second because of simple man made errors.  It’s not too late – many miles of beaches can still be saved but the government is doing nothing. In fact most state governments are making things worse.

It’s known around the world as the murder of India’s beaches. Even though it’s not clear to the naked eye, beaches are constantly moving, the sand moves up the coast line pushed by the winds and the waves especially during the monsoon.

Now when a port is built, it breaks this natural movement of sand.  As a result sand piles up south of the port.  But north of the beach the sand gets eroded as it moves further north.  If it goes on there will only be rocks, not beaches left.

That is why marina beach in Chennai has so much sand – but if one goes north of the port, the beaches are gone, lost.  They are destroyed.

In other parts of the world, it is mandatory for all ports to dredge sand from one side and place it on the other side, but not in India.

Instead in India the government gives lucrative contracts to businessmen to fill the eroded beaches with rocks and build walls of rocks.  India is building so many miles of rock walls where beaches used to be, that may be 20 or more years from now our entire coastline will be one long rock wall – longer than the great wall of China.

What’s killing the beaches even faster is the number of ports India is building.  Instead of 5 or 6 big modern profitable ports, India is commissioning a small new port every few months; most are loss making and cannot afford to dredge the sand.

There is another devastating effect of the death of our beaches.  The sand on beaches acts as a filter and stops the salt in sea water from going inland.  The problem with rocks is that they can’t act as a filter.  So wherever the eroded beaches are replaced by rocks and rock walls, more and more villages on our coastline have discovered that the underground water in their area has become saline, which in turn means that their crops and livelihoods are dying.

India used to be famous for its ‘necklace’ of beaches unless something is done fast. There will be no beaches but India will be famous for another kind of necklace, a necklace of rocks.

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Article in The Hindu: “Integrated coastal management plan sought “

Date:05/05/2009
Staff Reporter

Concern at impact of harbours and ports on coastal ecology

PUDUCHERRY: Concerned about the impact of harbours and ports on the coastal ecology and livelihood resources, members of fishing communities from Puducherry, Karaikal and Tamil Nadu and environment activists emphasised the need for formulating and implementing an integrated coastal management plan taking into account the well-being of the coastal environment and its communities and an effective monitoring programme for the coastal environment, before State governments allowed construction of ports and commercial harbours.

A consultation on the government policies on ports and harbours and its impact on coastal ecology, livelihood resources and fishing communities was organised by Coastal Action Network (CAN) and Pondy Citizens’ Action Network (PondyCAN) on Monday.

Speakers at the consultation said the construction of ports and harbours in the coastal zone had extensive impact on the coastal environment, leading to degradation. This affected the livelihood of families in the coastal communities.

Sudarshan Rodriguez from Dakshin Foundation said there were 199 notified ports, of which 12 were major ports and 187 minor ports. The Central government, in the 11th Five Year Plan, identified 331 ports for development on the mainland, roughly one port for every 20 km.

He said there was poor science and planning in coastal management, development and environment planning and environmental de-regulation of coastal management and environmental impact assessment laws. Many port projects were coupled with Special Economic Zone, rail and highway corridors, he added

Another speaker Gandhimathi of CAN said river courses were affected due to the Karaikal port. Ports affected groundwater, contaminated water sediments, coastal and land ecology and caused beach erosion.

The consultation noted that harbours in Chennai, Ennore, Puducherry, Cuddalore, Karaikal and Nagapattinam have caused damage to the coastline in the form of coastal erosion, salt water intrusion, damage to agriculture and ecology, increased vulnerability to natural calamities.

Consolidating the recommendations put forward during the meet, the participants submitted a resolution that State governments should take appropriate action not to allow construction of ports and commercial harbours unless – coastal areas, which were already damaged due to man-made interventions, have been identified and studied, restored to its pristine and undisturbed condition.

With coastal communities not being consulted for developments along the coastline, the resolutions stressed the need to accept and accord the land rights of fishing and coastal community through a legitimate means and process. A consultative process to take in the views and requirements of all sections of the coastal communities was necessary.

The Coastal Regulation Zone notification related to coastal environment should be implemented properly, the members insisted.

© Copyright 2000 – 2008 The Hindu

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Consultation on the Government Policies on Ports and Harbours and its Impacts on Coastal Ecology, Livelihood Resources and Fishing Communities – 4 May 2009, Pondicherry

Coastal Action Network, in coordination with Pondy Citizens’ Action Network, invite you to a “Consultation on the Government Policies on Ports and Harbours and its Impacts on Coastal Ecology, Livelihood Resources and Fishing Communities” at PMSSS Meeting Hall, No.81, Laporte Street, between Gandhi and Bharati Street, Pondicherry on 4th May 2009 (Monday) at 9.30 a.m.

Important themes to be discussed in this Consultation are:

• State Policies on Ports and Harbours.
• The impacts of the existing Ports and Harbours on the Coastal Ecology, Livelihood Resources and Fishing Communities.
• A presentation of the documentation on the Vizhupuram coast due to the construction of the Pondicherry Port.
• Consolidating the demands and recommendations.
• Evolving action plan.

Important leaders from the fishing communities from Pondicherry and Karaikal, Environmental Activists, members of Coastal Action Network, Citizens’ Action Network, representatives of Panchayat Government and elected body and scientists are expected to participate in this Consultation.

We request you to participate and contribute your valuable ideas. Confirmation of your participation either through phone or in writing is requested.

Looking forward to your participation.

Contact Addresses:

Coastal Action Network (CAN):
Convenor, 11/1A, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsar Street (Backside of Nadar Street), Velippalayam, Nagapattinam – 611 001. Ph: 04365 – 248674, Tele Fax: 04365 248907, e-mail: coastalactionnetwork@rediffmail.com

Co-convenor, No. 10, Thomas Nagar, Little Mount, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015. Ph : 044–223 53 503, Fax : 044–223 55 905, E-mail – humanrightsfoundation@yahoo.co.in

Pondy Citizen’s Action Network (PondyCAN!): No: 34 Francois Martin Street, Kuruchikuppam, Pondicherry–605012, Ph: 91-413-4210032, Mobile: 9894092933, email: info@pondycan.org http://www.pondycan.org

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized